SOLVED Editing Posts


Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
878
I am, undoubtedly, the worlds worst typist. The fault lies squarely in my back yard! I do not scan my own posts carefully, before posting.

But, would it be possible to make the "Edit" feature last a little longer.?
 
Ad

Advertisements

Regedit32

Moderator
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
967
Hi Dave.

I'll pass that request on to Ian.

Flick him an inbox too. He's been busy lately so an inbox will definitely get his attention :D
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,826
Reaction score
622
A draft message box would be nice, incomplete messages could be saved for completing and posting when completed. Just a thought!
 

Ian

Administrator
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
1,615
Reaction score
553
How long were you thinking Dave? It's set to 2 hours at at the moment, as we get a lot of spammers taking advantage when it's set higher. I may be able to extend this limit for higher posting users though :). Sorry for the slow reply, I've got a busy schedule until the end of the month :eek:.

A draft message box would be nice, incomplete messages could be saved for completing and posting when completed. Just a thought!
That's kind of possible at the moment, but it's designed as a "last resort" to save messages that may be lost during a browser crash. If you type out a reply or new thread, it should auto-save every minute to a local browser cache. It means that it'll probably be there when you come back to that same page. It's not something to rely on, but thought it was worth mentioning here in case it's useful.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
878
"may be able to extend this limit for higher posting users"

No way. That would look like special privilege. I can see difficulties here, as posters can alter there post significantly if too much leeway is given. Best leave it. I'll take more care.
 

Trouble

Noob Whisperer
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
12,391
Reaction score
1,992
I may be able to extend this limit for higher posting users
No way. That would look like special privilege
I don't see it as a "special privilege".
I see it more as a reward or benefit for those conscientious members who are proven valuable contributors.
With no other manner with which to reward these types of members, I think that something as simple as extending their ability to edit their posts would be a very small means of recognizing their contributions.
I often edit my posts, but....
I usually read mine almost immediately after posting just to check for typos, misspelling, spacing and such to make sure that it is at least close to what I intended.
Editing, too long after the fact, might be generally useless as the "edit" might go unnoticed and may be better corrected with a subsequent post for clarification
 

Regedit32

Moderator
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
967
There are occasions where being able to post more than 10 images to a reply would be helpful.

While you're at it can you build me a Pyramid so I can practice my heiroglyphics :D

Could use some fresh bandages too — pretty sure I wasn't green when they entombed me. But then again why ruin a good alien conspiracy :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian
Ad

Advertisements

Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,826
Reaction score
622
Ian draft messages was just a suggestion. I really dont fin it that useful and have it disabled on my forum. Like you say it's good for browser crashes, or no redirects. Thats' easily solved with copy and paste. Please don't go to any trouble, like davehc said if it ain't broke why fix it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

Ian

Administrator
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
1,615
Reaction score
553
No way. That would look like special privilege. I can see difficulties here, as posters can alter there post significantly if too much leeway is given. Best leave it. I'll take more care.
Maybe I can run a trial of limiting editing time to 2 hours for new members, then relax the limit for regular posters - I'm sure there's a balance we can find so that it's not seen as anything other than a sensible restriction for new posters as an anti-spam measure :). Once I'm out of this busy period, I'll see what options are available and perhaps we can give a trial a go. I'm happy to be flexible for members that clearly aren't here to spam ;). It may be that something can be coded to allow for slight changes, i.e. spelling corrections but the inability to place links - in which case we can roll it out for everyone.

There would still be a modest limit on time editing, so that threads cant be edited weeks later and confuse the flow of posts.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,826
Reaction score
622
That sounds like a solid plan. Don't make it a priority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

Regedit32

Moderator
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
967
Maybe introduce predictive text?!

If nothing else it could produce some interesting posts :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian
Ad

Advertisements

Trouble

Noob Whisperer
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
12,391
Reaction score
1,992
Don't make it a priority.
Agreed.
There doesn't seem to be any great demand to adjust the feature as it currently exists.
I'm not sure who, if anyone would actually even notice a change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top